Searching the RRID Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

Search

Type in a keyword to search

On page 1 showing 1 ~ 2 out of 2 results
Snippet view Table view Download 2 Result(s)
Click the to add this resource to a Collection

Authors: Juho Eineluoto, Petrus Järvinen, Anu Kenttämies, Tuomas Kilpeläinen, Hanna Vasarainen, Kevin Sandeman, Andrew Erickson, Tuomas Mirtti, Antti Rannikko
Summary: Introduction: This study was conducted to describe the repeat multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) changes occurring in prostate cancer (PCa) patients during active surveillance (AS), and to study possible associations between mpMRI-related parameters in predicting prostate biopsy (Bx) Gleason score (GS) upgrading >3+3 (GU) and protocol-based treatment change (TC). Materials and methods: The study cohort consisted of 76 AS patients with GS 3+3 PCa and at least two consecutive mpMRIs of the prostate performed between 2006 and 2015. Patients were followed according to the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocol and additional mpMRIs. The primary end points were GS upgrading (GU) (>3+3) in protocol-based biopsies and protocol-based TC. Results: 53/76 (69%) patients had progression (PIRADS upgrade, size increase or new lesion[s]), 18/76 (24%) had radiologically stable disease, and 5/76 (7%) had regression (PIRADS or size decrease, disappearance of lesion[s]) in repeat mpMRIs during AS. PIRADS scores 4 to 5 in the initial mpMRI was associated with GU (p=0.008) and protocol-based TC (p=0.009). Tumour progression on repeat mpMRIs was associated with TC (p=0.045) but not with GU (p=1.00). PIRADS scores 4-5 predict GU (sensitivity 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI); 0.51-0.95, specificity 0.62 [95% CI; 0.52-0.77]) with PPV and NPV values of 0.34 (95% CI; 0.21-0.55) and 0.93 (95% CI; 0.80-0.98), respectively. Conclusion: mpMRI is a useful tool not only to select but also to monitor PCa patients on AS.

Proper citation: Juho Eineluoto, Petrus Järvinen, Anu Kenttämies, Tuomas Kilpeläinen, Hanna Vasarainen, Kevin Sandeman, Andrew Erickson, Tuomas Mirtti, Antti Rannikko 2017. Repeat multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. protocols.io dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.j5jcq4n Copy   


Authors: Juho Eineluoto, Petrus Järvinen, Anu Kenttämies, Tuomas Kilpeläinen, Hanna Vasarainen, Kevin Sandeman, Andrew Erickson, Tuomas Mirtti, Antti Rannikko
Summary: Introduction: This study was conducted to describe the repeat multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) changes occurring in prostate cancer (PCa) patients during active surveillance (AS), and to study possible associations between mpMRI-related parameters in predicting prostate biopsy (Bx) Gleason score (GS) upgrading >3+3 (GU) and protocol-based treatment change (TC). Materials and methods: The study cohort consisted of 76 AS patients with GS 3+3 PCa and at least two consecutive mpMRIs of the prostate performed between 2006 and 2015. Patients were followed according to the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocol and additional mpMRIs. The primary end points were GS upgrading (GU) (>3+3) in protocol-based biopsies and protocol-based TC. Results: 53/76 (69%) patients had progression (PIRADS upgrade, size increase or new lesion[s]), 18/76 (24%) had radiologically stable disease, and 5/76 (7%) had regression (PIRADS or size decrease, disappearance of lesion[s]) in repeat mpMRIs during AS. PIRADS scores 4 to 5 in the initial mpMRI was associated with GU (p=0.008) and protocol-based TC (p=0.009). Tumour progression on repeat mpMRIs was associated with TC (p=0.045) but not with GU (p=1.00). PIRADS scores 4-5 predict GU (sensitivity 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI); 0.51-0.95, specificity 0.62 [95% CI; 0.52-0.77]) with PPV and NPV values of 0.34 (95% CI; 0.21-0.55) and 0.93 (95% CI; 0.80-0.98), respectively. Conclusion: mpMRI is a useful tool not only to select but also to monitor PCa patients on AS.

Proper citation: Juho Eineluoto, Petrus Järvinen, Anu Kenttämies, Tuomas Kilpeläinen, Hanna Vasarainen, Kevin Sandeman, Andrew Erickson, Tuomas Mirtti, Antti Rannikko 2017. Repeat multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. protocols.io dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.j66crhe Copy   



Can't find your Protocol?

We recommend that you click next to the search bar to check some helpful tips on searches and refine your search firstly. If you want to find a specific protocol and you know the DOI of the protocol already, it's easier to enter a DOI to search. You can refine the search results using Facets on the left side of the search results page. If you are on the table view, you can also search in a specific column by clicking the column title and enter the keywords.

If you still could not find your protocol in the search results, please help us by adding it into the system — it's easy. Create and publish your protocols at Protocols.io.

Can't find the RRID you're searching for? X
  1. NIDDK Information Network Resources

    Welcome to the dkNET Resources search. From here you can search through a compilation of resources used by dkNET and see how data is organized within our community.

  2. Navigation

    You are currently on the Community Resources tab looking through categories and sources that dkNET has compiled. You can navigate through those categories from here or change to a different tab to execute your search through. Each tab gives a different perspective on data.

  3. Logging in and Registering

    If you have an account on dkNET then you can log in from here to get additional features in dkNET such as Collections, Saved Searches, and managing Resources.

  4. Searching

    Here is the search term that is being executed, you can type in anything you want to search for. Some tips to help searching:

    1. Use quotes around phrases you want to match exactly
    2. You can manually AND and OR terms to change how we search between words
    3. You can add "-" to terms to make sure no results return with that term in them (ex. Cerebellum -CA1)
    4. You can add "+" to terms to require they be in the data
    5. Using autocomplete specifies which branch of our semantics you with to search and can help refine your search
  5. Save Your Search

    You can save any searches you perform for quick access to later from here.

  6. Query Expansion

    We recognized your search term and included synonyms and inferred terms along side your term to help get the data you are looking for.

  7. Collections

    If you are logged into dkNET you can add data records to your collections to create custom spreadsheets across multiple sources of data.

  8. Sources

    Here are the sources that were queried against in your search that you can investigate further.

  9. Categories

    Here are the categories present within dkNET that you can filter your data on

  10. Subcategories

    Here are the subcategories present within this category that you can filter your data on

  11. Further Questions

    If you have any further questions please check out our FAQs Page to ask questions and see our tutorials. Click this button to view this tutorial again.

X