Tools   Select Another Resource Report Type

http://clinicaltrials.gov/

Registry and results database of federally and privately supported clinical trials conducted in United States and around world. Provides information about purpose of trial, who may participate, locations, and phone numbers for more details. This information should be used in conjunction with advice from health care professionals.Offers information for locating federally and privately supported clinical trials for wide range of diseases and conditions. Research study in human volunteers to answer specific health questions. Interventional trials determine whether experimental treatments or new ways of using known therapies are safe and effective under controlled environments. Observational trials address health issues in large groups of people or populations in natural settings. ClinicalTrials.gov contains trials sponsored by National Institutes of Health, other federal agencies, and private industry. Studies listed in database are conducted in all 50 States and in 178 countries.

Proper citation: ClinicalTrials.gov (RRID:SCR_002309) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/

NLM collects, organizes, and makes available biomedical science information to scientists, health professionals, and the public. The Library's Web-based databases, including PubMed/Medline and MedlinePlus, are used extensively around the world. NLM conducts and supports research in biomedical communications; creates information resources for molecular biology, biotechnology, toxicology, and environmental health; and provides grant and contract support for training, medical library resources, and biomedical informatics and communications research. Celebrating its 175th anniversary in 2011, the National Library of Medicine (NLM), in Bethesda, Maryland, is a part of the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Since its founding in 1836 as the library of the U.S. Army Surgeon General, NLM has played a pivotal role in translating biomedical research into practice. It is the world's largest biomedical library and the developer of electronic information services that deliver trillions of bytes of data to millions of users every day. Scientists, health professionals, and the public in the United States and around the globe search the Library's online information resources more than 1 billion times each year. The Library is open to all and has many services and resources for scientists, health professionals, historians, and the general public. NLM has over 17 million books, journals, manuscripts, audiovisuals, and other forms of medical information on its shelves, making it the largest health-science library in the world. In today's increasingly digital world, NLM carries out its mission of enabling biomedical research, supporting health care and public health, and promoting healthy behavior by: * Acquiring, organizing, and preserving the world's scholarly biomedical literature; * Providing access to biomedical and health information across the country in partnership with the 5,800-member National Network of Libraries of Medicine (NN/LM); * Serving as a leading global resource for building, curating and providing sophisticated access to molecular biology and genomic information, including those from the Human Genome Project and NIH Common Fund; * Creating high-quality information services relevant to toxicology and environmental health, health services research, and public health; * Conducting research and development on biomedical communications systems, methods, technologies, and networks and information dissemination and utilization among health professionals, patients, and the general public; * Funding advanced biomedical informatics research and serving as the primary supporter of pre- and post-doctoral research training in biomedical informatics at 18 U.S. universities.

Proper citation: National Library of Medicine (RRID:SCR_011446) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

http://www.nimh.nih.gov/trials/index.shtml

NIMH supports research studies on mental health and disorders. Participate, refer a patient or learn about results of studies in ClinicalTrials.gov, the NIH/National Library of Medicine''''s registry of federally and privately funded clinical trials for all disease. Find NIH-funded studies currently recruiting participants in the following mental health topics: * Anxiety Disorders ** Generalized Anxiety Disorder ** Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) ** Panic Disorder ** Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) ** Social Phobia (Social Anxiety Disorder) * Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD, ADD) * Autism Spectrum Disorders (Pervasive Developmental Disorders) * Bipolar Disorder (Manic-Depressive Illness) * Borderline Personality Disorder * Depression * Eating Disorders * HIV/AIDS * Schizophrenia * Suicide Prevention Information Resources for NIMH Researchers Conducting Clinical Trials * Limited Access Datasets from NIMH-Supported Clinical Trials * NIMH Policy for Recruitment of Participants in Clinical Research * NIMH Policy on Data and Safety Monitoring in Extramural Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trials * Register a study with ClinicalTrials.gov

Proper citation: NIMH Clinical Trials (RRID:SCR_005613) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

http://dknet.org/

The NIDDK Information Network (dkNET) is a community-based network to serve needs of basic and clinical investigators that includes large pools of data and research resources relevant to mission of National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease.

Proper citation: NIDDK Information Network (dkNET) (RRID:SCR_001606) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://edic.bsc.gwu.edu

Publications from a multi-center, longitudinal, observational study examining the risk factors associated with the long-term complications of type 1 diabetes. The study began in 1994 and follows the 1441 participants previously enrolled in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/control/index.aspx. The primary aim of EDIC is to examine the long-term effects of conventional vs. intensive diabetes treatment received during the DCCT on the subsequent development and progression of microvascular, neuropathic and cardiovascular complications. This involves studying the influence of genetic factors and other factors such as HbA1c, blood pressure, lipid levels, and treatment modalities on the development and progression of these complications. Annual or biennial measurements (using DCCT methods, standardized protocols and central laboratories) of vascular events, albumin excretion, GFR, ECG, ankle-brachial BP index, serum lipids and HbA1c allows the following analyses: 1) continuation of intention-to-treat analyses to determine long-term effects of prior separation of glycemic levels; 2) risk factors for macrovascular outcomes; 3) correlation of progression of micro- and macrovascular outcomes. The current updated version of the EDIC Protocol is available for download. EDIC is made up of 28 clinical centers, one data coordinating center and one clinical coordinating center.

Proper citation: Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (RRID:SCR_001468) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://repository.niddk.nih.gov/study/119

Multi-center randomized clinical trial to determine if the addition of behavioral treatment to drug therapy for the treatment of urge incontinence will make it possible to discontinue the drug and still maintain a reduced number of accidents. The most popular treatments for urge incontinence are drug therapy and behavior therapy, each with its own limitations. In this clinical study, the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN) aims to determine differences with the addition of behavioral treatment to drug therapy alone.

Proper citation: Behavior Enhances Drug Reduction of Incontinence (RRID:SCR_001495) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

http://www.healthystudy.org/

Primary prevention trial conducted in 42 middle schools at 7 locations across the US to impact risk factors for type 2 diabetes in adolescents. Students were recruited at the start of 6th grade (fall 2006) and followed to the end of 8th grade (spring 2009). Half of the schools were randomized to receive an intervention that integrated four components: the school nutrition environment, physical education class activities, behavior change initiatives, and educational and promotional communications activities.

Proper citation: HEALTHY study (RRID:SCR_001530) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

http://todaystudy.org/

Randomized, double blind, nationwide clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of three interventions to treat adolescents and youth with type 2 diabetes (T2D): (1) metformin alone, (2) metformin plus rosiglitazone, and (3) metformin plus an intensive lifestyle intervention called the TODAY Lifestyle Program (TLP). The secondary aims are to: compare and evaluate the safety of the three treatment arms; compare the effects of the three treatments on the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes (T2D) with regards to beta cell function and insulin resistance, body composition, nutrition, physical activity and aerobic fitness, cardiovascular risk factors, microvascular complications, quality of life, and psychological outcomes; evaluate the influence of individual and family behaviors on treatment response; and compare the relative cost effectiveness of the three treatment arms. The study recruits patients over a three-year period and follows patients for a minimum of two years. Patients are randomized within two years of the diagnosis of T2D. Materials that were used for the study are made publicly available: * The TODAY Standard Diabetes Education (TSDE) program, developed especially for youth with type 2 diabetes. (All participants received the TSDE program) * The TODAY Lifestyle Program (TLP) that was among the treatments tested.

Proper citation: Treatment Options for type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (RRID:SCR_001547) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://scicrunch.org/resolver/SCR_002250

THIS RESOURCE IS NO LONGER IN SERVICE. Documented Jul 19, 2024. Metadatabase manually curated that provides web accessible tools related to genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. Used as informative directory for multi-omic data analysis.

Proper citation: OMICtools (RRID:SCR_002250) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://jhuccs1.us/gpcrc/

Perform clinical, epidemiological, and therapeutic research in gastroparesis and provide an infrastructure that can rapidly and efficiently design and conduct clinical trials for effective medical, surgical, or other interventions to improve treatment of patients with gastroparesis. The GpCRC studies comprise well characterized individuals with diabetic, surgical, and idiopathic gastroparesis.

Proper citation: Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium (RRID:SCR_006673) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

http://www.nimh.nih.gov/funding/clinical-trials-for-researchers/practical/tordia/treatment-of-ssri-resistant-depression-in-adolescents-tordia.shtml

A multi-site, clinical research study examining treatment options for teens whose depression has not improved after one adequate trial of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), a type of antidepressant. The purpose of the study is to determine how best to treat adolescents with depression that is resistant to the first SSRI antidepressant they have tried. Participants receive one of three other antidepressant medications, either alone or in combination with cognitive behavioral therapy. The TORDIA study aims to develop useful clinical guidelines for the care and management of adolescent depression. Adolescents ages 12 to 18, currently taking a prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and still experiencing depression, participate in a 12-week randomized treatment study that includes one of four conditions: (1) switching to an alternative SSRI, (2) switching to a different non-SSRI antidepressant, (3) switching to an alternative SSRI and receiving cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), or (4) switching to a different non-SSRI antidepressant and receiving CBT. This is a double-blind study, which means that neither the participant nor the clinical staff will know which of the three possible medications has been assigned. Participants who respond to the assigned treatment will receive 12 additional weeks of the same treatment. Those who do not appear to be getting better will be offered 12 weeks of an alternative, individualized treatment plan based on each participant''s particular needs. All participants will receive follow-up psychiatric evaluations for 12 months after the 12-week continuation phase of the study, regardless of treatment adherence. For more information visit, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00018902?term=clinical+trial+AND+treatment+of+ssri-resistant+AND+depression+AND+TORDIA+AND+study&rank=1

Proper citation: Treatment of SSRI-resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA) (RRID:SCR_008831) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://scicrunch.org/scicrunch/data/source/nlx_154697-5/search?q=*

A virtual database currently indexing clinical trials databases including EU Clinical Trials Register and Clinicaltrials.gov.

Proper citation: Integrated Clinical Trials (RRID:SCR_005969) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://repository.niddk.nih.gov/study/36

Data set and biosepecimens of a multi-center clinical trial to determine if treatment with beta-cell antigens can delay the onset of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Type 1 DM) in non-diabetic relatives of persons with Type 1 DM. Insulin is a well characterized antigen specifically produced by beta-cells, and it was used for this purpose in the initial DPT-1 studies. The protocol for high risk subjects uses daily subcutaneous insulin injections and an annual course of intravenous insulin treatment, while the protocol for intermediate risk subjects uses daily doses of insulin administered orally. Neither injected nor oral insulin at the doses used were observed to delay or prevent diabetes, although further studies are needed to test whether oral insulin can delay diabetes in people in the intermediate risk group with high titers of insulin autoantibodies.

Proper citation: Diabetes Prevention Type 1 (RRID:SCR_001467) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00021814

Multi-center double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of finasteride, or doxazosin, or the combination of both, in delaying or preventing the clinical progression of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MTOPS was the largest and longest study to test whether drug therapy can prevent or delay the noncancerous growth of the prostate. A unique feature of MTOPS that has not been done in prior studies of pharmacotherapy of BPH is the biopsy substudy. A total of 1,082 volunteers from the 2,931 participants randomized during the full-scale phase are currently participating in this substudy. Biopsies of the prostate will be obtained on these volunteers at predetermined times during the course of the trial to evaluate the status of the prostate at key event times. The purpose of the substudy was to provide additional information regarding the histopathobiology of BPH and to test existing biomarkers for their prognostic ability regarding response to drug therapy.

Proper citation: Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms (RRID:SCR_001556) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

http://www.bsc.gwu.edu/dpp/protocol.htmlvdoc

Observational clinical trial studying the long term effect of diet and exercise and the diabetes medication, metformin, on the delay of type 2 diabetes in participants of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) was a multi-center trial examining the ability of an intensive lifestyle or metformin to prevent or delay the development of diabetes in a high risk population due to the presence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). The DPP has ended early demonstrating that lifestyle reduced diabetes onset by 58% and metformin reduced diabetes onset by 31%. The DPPOS is designed to take advantage of the scientifically and clinically valuable DPP participants. This group of participants is nearly 50% minority and represents the largest IGT population ever studied. Clinically important research questions remain that focus on 1)durability of the prior DPP intervention, 2) determination of the clinical course of precisely known new onset diabetes, in particular regarding CVD, CVD risk factors and atherosclerosis and microvascular disease, 3)close examination of these topics in men vs women and in minority populations. More than 87% of the original surviving DPP cohort has joined DPPOS as of December, 2007 and, to date, after 5 years of DPPOS and 10 years of combined DPP/DPPOS, 93% of the DPPOS cohort continue to attend annual follow-up visits. Interim analyses performed after 5 years of DPPOS have demonstrated a durable effect of diabetes prevention associated with the lifestyle and metformin interventions with 34 and 19% reductions in diabetes incidence, respectively, compared with the placebo group. Interim analyses also reveal significant reductions from baseline in CVD risk factors in the lifestyle intervention group, but with decreased utilization of glucose-lowering and lipid-lowering medications. Analyses of the participants in the placebo group who have developed diabetes during DPP/DPPOS, compared with those who have remained non-diabetic, reveal an increased frequency of retinopathy and microalbuminuria. The current, updated protocol describes the DPPOS including the revisions incorporated to complete the second five-years of the study. DPPOS participants have blood samples stored at the time of each annual visit. Specimens are stored at the study CBL until after the primary study outcomes are reported. DNA samples were previously collected and are stored at the NIDDKsample repository for DPP participants.

Proper citation: Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (RRID:SCR_001502) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://repository.niddk.nih.gov/study/44

Randomized controlled clinical trial to understand how increasing hemodialysis to six times a week from the standard of three times a week may result in improved heart health. Subjects were recruited from dialysis units associated with designated Clinical Centers in the U.S. and Canada and followed for 1 year. Subjects will be randomized to either conventional hemodialyis Daily HD delivered for at least 2.5 hours (typically 3 to 4 hours), 3 days per week, or to more frequent hemodialysis delivered for 1.5 - 2.75 hours, 6 days per week. The study has two co-primary outcomes: 1) a composite of mortality with the change over 12 months in left ventricular mass by magnetic resonance imaging, and 2) a composite of mortality with the change over 12 months in the SF-36 RAND physical health composite (PHC) quality of life scale. In addition, main secondary outcomes have been designated for each of seven outcome domains: 1) cardiovascular structure and function (change in LV mass), 2) health-related quality of life/physical function (change in the PHC), 3) depression/burden of illness (change in Beck Depression Inventory), 4) nutrition (change in serum albumin), 5) cognitive function (change in the Trail Making Test B), 6) mineral metabolism (change in average predialysis serum phosphorus), and 7) clinical events (rate of non-access hospitalization or death). Hypertension and anemia are also main outcome domains, but without designation of single first priority outcomes.

Proper citation: Frequent Hemodialysis Network Daily Trial (RRID:SCR_001527) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://repository.niddk.nih.gov/study/47

Study designed to test the hypothesis that African-Americans respond less well to combination pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy than Caucasian-Americans who have chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 and who were not previously treated with either interferon or ribavirin. Reasons for differences in response, regardless of race, will be studied. All patients were treated with combination therapy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin for 48 weeks, and were followed for an additional 48 week safter cessation of therapy. 400 patients, half African-American and half Caucasian American, from 8 clinical centers with the goals of establishing rates of response to optimal current therapy in the two ethnic groups, identify factors predictive of response, establish patterns of viral kinetics in response to antiviral therapy, and test hypotheses concerning viral and host factors determining response to therapy. Four ancillary studies designed to elucidate biological and virological basis for non-response are also included in Virahep-C. Additionally, the study has central facilitates for pathology, the virological testing laboratory and a serum/tissue repository.

Proper citation: Viral Resistance to Antiviral Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis C (RRID:SCR_001553) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00392678?term=SALSALATE&viewType=Table&rank=8

Nationwide, randomized, double blind, multi-center research study to determine whether the drug salsalate, a member of the commonly used Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) class, is effective in lowering sugars in patients with type 2 diabetes. The study is conducted in two stages. The primary objective of the first stage is to select a dose of salsalate that is both well-tolerated and demonstrates a trend toward improvement in glycemic control. The primary objective of Stage 2 of the study is to evaluate the effects of salsalate on blood sugar control in diabetes; the tolerability of salsalate use in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D); and the effects of salsalate on measures of inflammation, the metabolic syndrome, and cardiac risk.

Proper citation: TINSAL-T2D (RRID:SCR_001546) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00580749

Randomized multi-center clinical trial designed to test whether duodenojejunal (DJ) feeding is more effective than nasogastric (NG) feeding in providing enteral nutrition to patients with severe acute pancreatitis. SNAP will enroll participants with severe acute pancreatitis admitted to the intensive care unit at eight clinical centers. Upon enrollment, participants are assigned to NG or DJ feeding and managed for up to 28 days or until weaned on to solid food. Follow-up continues until participants are discharged from the hospital or for a maximum of 60 days. Outcomes relate to feeding tolerance and failure, nutritional status, risk for life-threatening pancreatic/systemic complications, and hospital mortality.

Proper citation: Study of Nutrition in Acute Pancreatitis (RRID:SCR_001544) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry
  

http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00100659

Multi-center, randomized controlled trial that studied peginterferon therapy, with or without ribavirin, in children with chronic hepatitis C. Approximately 120 children were randomly assigned to receive peginterferon alfa-2a alone or peginterferon with ribavirin for 48 weeks. Samples of blood, genomic DNA, and liver tissue are stored in the NIDDKrepositories. A long-term follow up study of the clinical trial participants is underway.

Proper citation: Peginterferon and Ribavirin for Pediatric Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C (RRID:SCR_006787) Copy   

•   Source: SciCrunch Registry