Searching the RRID Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes
Protocol Name
PDF Report How to cite
Ka-young Ban, D Osborn, Y Hameed, S Pandey, J Perez, PB Jones, JB Kirkbride 2020. Personality disorder in an Early Intervention Psychosis cohort: Findings from the Social Epidemiology of Psychoses in East Anglia (SEPEA) study. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bf3hjqj6
Copy Citation Copied
Protocol Information

URL: https://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.17504/protocols.io.bf3hjqj6

Authors: Ka-young Ban, D Osborn, Y Hameed, S Pandey, J Perez, PB Jones, JB Kirkbride

Summary: Aim: Personality Disorders (PD) often share clinical and phenomenological overlap with psychotic disorders, especially at onset. However, there is little research on comorbid PD among people experiencing first episode psychosis. We examined the prevalence of PD recording and its sociodemographic and clinical correlates in people accepted to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services. Methods: Participants were aged 16-35, accepted into 6 EIP services for suspected psychosis, as part of the Social Epidemiology of Psychoses in East Anglia (SEPEA) study. PD was recorded by clinicians according to ICD-10. Multilevel logistic regression was performed. Results: Of 798 participants, 76 people (9.5%) received a clinical diagnosis of PD, with emotionally unstable PD (75.0%, N=57) the most common subtype. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for PD included female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 3.4; 95% CI: 2.0-5.7), absence of psychotic disorder after acceptance to EIP (OR: 3.0; 95% CI: 1.6-5.5), more severe hallucinations (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2-2.1), and lower parental SES (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-1.8). Compared with the white British, black and minority ethnic groups were less likely to receive a PD diagnosis (OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7). There was no association between PD and neighbourhood-level deprivation or population-density. Conclusions: Recording of a PD diagnosis was three times more common amongst participants later found not to meet threshold criteria for psychotic disorder, implying phenomenological overlap at referral which highlights difficulties encountered in accurate diagnostic assessment, treatment and onward referral. People with PD experienced more individual-level, but not neighbourhood-level social disadvantage in an already disadvantaged sample.

Associated Publications: Ban K, Osborn DPJ, Hameed Y, Pandey S, Perez J, Jones PB, Kirkbride JB (2020) Personality disorder in an Early Intervention Psychosis cohort: Findings from the Social Epidemiology of Psychoses in East Anglia (SEPEA) study. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0234047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234047

Affiliations: University College London, University of London, University College London, University of London; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, UK, Norfolk & Suffolk Foundation Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, UK, Norfolk & Suffolk Foundation Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, UK, University of Cambridge; Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Foundation Trust, and NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) East of England, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK, University of Cambridge; Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Foundation Trust, and NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) East of England, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK, University College London, University of London

External URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234047

Version: 1

Publication Date: 2020

Expand All
Usage and Citation Metrics

Coming soon.

Checkfor resource mentions.

Collaborator Network

Coming soon.

Data and Source Information

Source: