Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.
Ruth-Anne Sandaa, Steven M. Short, and Declan C. Schroeder 2016. Fingerprinting aquatic virus communities using pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). protocols.io dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.dy27ydCopy Citation Copied
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.dy27yd
Authors: Ruth-Anne Sandaa, Steven M. Short, and Declan C. Schroeder
Group: VERVE Net
Summary: The viral concentrate used for PFGE analysis must be molded into plugs, followed by lysis of the virus particles to release their DNA. It is possible to run solution-based preparation of viral DNA for PFGE (Steward 2001); however, large DNA molecules (>100 kb) are extremely sensitive to mechanical shearing in aqueous solution (Bouchez and Camilleri 1997). The consensus is that lysis inside viral plugs prevents mechanical shearing of the DNA, resulting in more discrete PFGE bands. Intact viral genomes are then separated by size by PFGE. After separation, the banding pattern is visualized by staining with a fluorescent DNA stain. This banding pattern provides a visual record of the genome size distribution that can be used for qualitative and quantitative comparisons between samples.
Affiliations: Manual of Aquatic Viral Ecology, Manual of Aquatic Viral Ecology, Manual of Aquatic Viral Ecology
External URL: http://www.aslo.org/books/mave/MAVE_009.pdf
Version: 1
Publication Date: 2016
Expand AllComing soon.
Source: Protocols.io